Here is the latest link to an article in the NZ Herald calling for "Heads to Roll" in the current Northern Administration.LINK
A big thank you to Clint Packer Central's regional Head Coach for allowing me to use his comment he left on the Petition yesterday. His thoughts are very logical and I think practical and hence my Topic Exclusive vs Inclusive.
In the past decade I’ve
noticed a growing trend -
- we continue to lose our best coaches to
overseas positions – or worse, they quit coaching all together
- internal structures are dying or
failing such as National events and Regional strategies
Last year we had 7 National selectors not
reapply for their National selector roles (I was one of them) and now we are on
the verge of losing another important event, the National team’s
event.
5 years ago, with the support of an
incredible Tennis Central staff, I knew our region required a change and a new
challenge for the both the players and the coaches. I introduced 4 new events
and a point’s race with a final Masters event in order to select our Central
Team to compete at the NZ team’s event. Some of the events have evolved and
possibly require further adjustments, however since –
- Events/Tournament numbers continually
improved
- Under performing Tournaments received
more support
- Players “earned” their way into our
team – no one is a “targeted athlete” and
automatically selected regardless of
their performance (TNZ)
- New coaches emerged and regardless of
what they individually thought of each other or
me personally as the Performance Coach,
they now had an event structure to coach
towards to develop their own culture in a
competitive environment
- Mini tennis climates and training
grounds were noticed and rewarded
- Tennis coaching ‘brands’ are now
everywhere in Central
- Most Coaches/players all support our
Performance Centre
(35 from 38 local reps train in our RPC –
5 years in a row)
TNZ need to understand that coaches at
the coalface are their biggest asset for building the game from the ground up.
The NZ team’s event will reward our kids for their efforts and provide our young
coaches with further opportunities. It’s a culture building opportunity for
everyone in our Region as it should be across our sport within NZ.
Tennis New Zealand’s very first objective
in their HP strategy is -
“To have a performance driven program
with a shared organisational culture and strong strategic relationships with
stakeholders all focused on our HP vision”
Given the numbers involved having the
opportunity to represent their region under the TNZ ‘brand’, surely the National
Teams event needs to be a major part of this objective?
What’s also contrary to this objective is
that National selectors and National coaches have recently made decisions to
only select their ‘targeted athletes’ above kids who actually performed at their
own National titles. This included selection of players who don’t live in NZ and
one player in the JDC team who hasn’t even played in New Zealand….I don’t even
know if he’s a member of a club?
What message does this send to both the
targeted players and “everyone else”?
- TNZ’s targeted kids now require zero
accountability at our own NZ titles
- the rest of the contenders now have
nothing to play for
- coaches have nothing to coach
towards
- Parents of non-targeted players can
stop spending their money attending National titles because “targeted players”
have already been chosen, in fact they might not even be there to play
against.
This philosophy is not exactly
“Performance Driven” and is simply an example of the culture killing attitude
occurring within our sport in NZ
What about this concept
- Free up all the HP money and stop
paying National Coaches and stop the funding for these targeted kids
- Use that money by investing in event
structures with financial or opportunity rewards for all players at all stages
with more prominent rewards at our National events
(12’s through to adult ‘futures’
level)
If you do that then everyone’s culture,
abilities and environments are in play!
Now to me that’s a “performance driven
program with a shared organisational culture and strong strategic relationships
with stakeholders all focused on our HP vision”
My personal view is that I
am sick of losing important events and opportunities for our juniors who deserve
much better. Start implementing strategies that coaches can coach towards and
players can play to – It’s about time we stop shifting the goal posts for
terrible kickers. CLINT PACKER
Well said Clint!New Zealand Tennis continues to lack credibility ,as Clint says what message are you sending our juniors! I feel sorry for the NZ 16 year old boy that missed out on selection for Thomas Guy not living or playing in New Zealand , no Top Dog ranking , no Head to Head against his peers! I believe he is the son of former NZ Davis C upper Steve Guy who coaches in Europe.I am not taking a shot at this boy simply the current selection and pathway TNZ has developed!UNACCEPTABLE!
My question is how on earth can this happen? Clint says it all above. To-morrow I will dissect the high performance paper and it wont be pretty!
Finally another comment from the petition page from a current Top New Zealand tennis player
"bizzarre that tnz consider college tennis one of their "pathways" to the pro
tour, but abolish the only teams competition that is similar to college tennis.
I played 12s 14s and 16s teams events and benefited greatly because of the team
aspect, not to mention the preparation it gave me for college. Everyone that
knows anything about tennis on an international level know that nz juniors have
played so few matches compared to players from strong tennis nations, so why
abolish an opportunity for tough matches against the best players around the
country. Please explain"
Indeed TNZ you have some explaining to do and Tennis Northern I guess you used the exclusive pathway so when Parents queried aspects of Northern's costing they decided to teach these parents a lesson , exclusively not to send any Junior teams to Nationals!
IF YOU HAVE NOT SIGNED YET HERE IS THE LINK
Posts
